Understanding Addictions in terms of change
Would you be surprised if I told you that
a group of psychological
disorders costs hundreds of billions of dollars each year, kills more than
500,000 people annually and is implicated in street crime, homelessness, and
gang violence? Would you be even more surprised to learn that most of us have
behaved in ways characteristic of these traits at some point in our lives? You
shouldn’t.
Our 21st century
is preoccupied with the addiction such as Alcohol,
drugs, food, sex and gambling. Explanation for addiction
often have consisted of blaming individuals for their excessive engagement in
these behaviors. Scientific theories and models for explaining and
understanding addictions have existed only for the past 100 years. As
advancement of neuroscience linked the study of addiction and brain activity to
make the understanding more clearer and evident.
Many different
theories and models of addiction have been proposed. The most prominent
explanatory models include :
Social Models
Genetic Models
Personality
Models.
Coping Models
Conditioning
Models
Compulsive
behavior ModelsAn inteqrative biopsychosocial model.
Each of the
models proposes a way of understanding addiction or a specific addictive
behavior that focuses primarily on how addictions develop the evident change
due to the addiction.
People continue
to use psychoactive substances for their effects on mood, perception and
behavior despite the obvious negative consequences of abuse and dependence.
Drug abuse and dependence, once thought to be the result of moral weakness, are
now understood to be influenced by a combination of biological and psychosocial
factors.
Give a thought…….
Why do some people use psychoactive drugs without becoming dependent on them?
Why do some people stop using these drugs or use them in moderate amounts after
being dependent on them and others continue a lifelong pattern of dependence
despite their efforts to stop?
Social models
includes the exposure to these substances through friends, through the media
and so on. Research on the consequences of Cigarette advertising, for example,
suggests the effects of media Exposure may be more influential than peer
pressure in determining whether teens smoke (Jackson, Brown & L’Engle.
2007). In one large study, 820 adolescents (ages 1477) were studied to assess
what factors influenced the ag at which they would have their first drink of
alcohol (kuperman et at.,2013). This study found several factors predicted
early alcohol use including when their best friends started drinking, whether
their family was a high risk for alcohol
dependence, and the presence of behavior problems in these children.
Research suggest that drug addicted parents spend less time monitoring their
children than parents without drug problems. (Dishion, Patterson & Reid,
1988) and that this is an important contribution to early adolescent
substance use (Kerr, Stattin & Burk, 2010). Children influenced by drug use
at home may be exposed to peers who use drug use at home may be exposed to
peers who use drugs as well.
Researchers
conducting twin, gamily, and adoption
studies have found that certain people are genetically vulnerable to drug
abuse. Twin studies of smoking, for example, indicate a moderate genetic
influence (e.g. Hardie, Moss, & Lynch, 2006; McCaffery, Papandonatos,
Stanton, Lloyd Richardson, & Niaura, 2008). Genetic factors may affect how
people experience certain drugs, which in turn may partly determine who will or
will not become abusers.
Complex and
fascinating studied indicate the brain appears to have a natural “Pleasure
pathway” that mediate our experience of reward. All abused substances seem to
affect this internal reward center in the same way as you experience pleasure
from certain foods or from sex (Ray,2012). In other words, what Psychoactive
drugs may have in common is their ability to activate this reward center and
provide the user with a pleasurable experience, at least for a time. This
one-time pleasure can be obtained either by having a delicious food or by the
sexual activity.
What people
expect to experience when they use drugs influences how they react to them. A
person who expects to be less inhibited when she drinks alcohol will act less
inhibited whether she actually drink alcohol or a place so she thinks is
alcohol (Bailey & Baillie, 2012). Expectancies develop before people
actually use drugs, perhaps as a result of parents and peers drug use,
advertising and media figures who model drug use (Campbell & Oei, 2010).
The substances people use to alter mood and behavior have unique effects. The
high from herein differs substantially from the experience of smoking a
cigarette, which in turn differs from the effects of amphetamines or LSD.
Both becoming
addicted and recovery from addiction are journeys through on intentional,
multifaceted, and complicated yet understandable process of change. To better
understand the process of change we should look within at our own behavior
change. Change is a process, not a product.
Comments
Post a Comment